Alper v. Gallup, Inc.
Filing
19
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time. (Filing No. 15 .) For good cause shown, and in order to progress this case to final resolution, the Motion is granted . The previous deadlines are modified as set forth. The Final Pretrial Conference will be held before the Magistrate Judge on September 12, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. The trial date will be set by the Magistrate Judge at the time of the Final Pretrial Conf erence. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Cheryl Zwart to be held on September 12, 2012. No further extensions of time will be permitted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
NEIL S. ALPER,
Plaintiff,
v.
GALLUP, INC.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:11CV254
ORDER SETTING
SCHEDULE FOR
PROGRESSION OF CASE
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time.
(Filing No. 15.) For good cause shown, and in order to progress this case to final
resolution, the Motion is granted. The previous deadlines are modified as set forth
below.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Deposition and discovery deadline. All depositions, whether or not they
are intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by April 30, 2012. All
interrogatories, requests for admission and requests for production or inspection,
whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be served on or before
March 30, 2012.
2.
Motions to compel discovery shall be filed on or before April 30, 2012.
The parties must comply with the provisions of NECivR 7.0.1 before filing a motion
to compel.
3.
Dispositive Motions. All dispositive motions shall be filed on or before
May 27, 2012. The parties must comply with the provisions of NECivR 7.0.1 and
NECivR 56.1 when filing summary judgment motions.
4.
Pretrial Conference.
a.
Defense counsel will have the primary responsibility for drafting
the Order on Final Pretrial Conference, pursuant to the format and
requirements set out in NECivR 16.2(a)(2). The plaintiff will be
responsible for cooperating in the preparation and signing of the
final version of the Order. The Order should be submitted to the
plaintiff and to any other parties by August 3, 2012. The plaintiff
shall provide additions and/or proposed deletions to Defense
counsel by August 17, 2012. Defense counsel shall submit the
Proposed Order on Final Pretrial Conference to the court by no
later than August 31, 2012. If a party proposes an addition or
deletion which is not agreed to by all the other parties, that fact
should be noted in the text of the document. The Proposed Order
on Final Pretrial Conference must be signed by all pro se parties
and by counsel for all represented parties.
b.
The Final Pretrial Conference will be held before the Magistrate
Judge on September 12, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. Prior to the pretrial
conference, all items as directed in NECivR 16.2 and full
preparation shall have been completed so that trial may begin at
any time following the Pretrial Conference.
c.
If a plaintiff is held in an institution, the pretrial conference will
be by telephone. In that case, Defense counsel shall contact the
plaintiff’s institution in advance and arrange to initiate and place
the conference call.
5.
The trial date will be set by the Magistrate Judge at the time of the Final
Pretrial Conference.
2
6.
The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline in this case using the following text: Pretrial conference before Magistrate
Judge Cheryl Zwart to be held on September 12, 2012.
7.
No further extensions of time will be permitted.
DATED this 21st day of December, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?