James E: Kyles v. Heineman et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motions (Filing Nos. 8 , 9 , and 10 ) are denied without prejudice to reassertion after amendment of the Complaint in accordance with the court's October 24, 2011, Memorandum and Order (see Filing No. 7 ). Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JAMES E. KYLES,
DAVID E. HEINEMAN, et al.,
CASE NO. 8:11CV260
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s “Motion Seeking Status of Case and
Request to Expedite Review,” “Motion to Extend Time to Conduct Discovery,” and “Motion
for Limited Authority to Conduct Discovery.” (Filing Nos. 8, 9, and 10.) Upon careful
IT IS ORDERED that: Plaintiff’s Motions (Filing Nos. 8, 9, and 10) are denied without
prejudice to reassertion after amendment of the Complaint in accordance with the court’s
October 24, 2011, Memorandum and Order (see Filing No. 7).
DATED this 28th day of November, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for
the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the
services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of
these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality
of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does
not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?