Abraham v. Douglas County

Filing 64

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The Court construes plaintiff's December 6, 2012, Objection (Filing No. 53 ) as a response to defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk's office is directed to update the docket s heet to reflect that Filing Number 53 is a response to defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons explained to plaintiff in the Court's November 27, 2012, Memorandum and Order, plaintiff's "Motion for Hearing and F air Trial" (Filing No. 57 ) is denied. Plaintiff's "Motion to Suspend or Hold in Abeyance All Proceedings" (Filing No. 59 ), "Objections to Defendant Proposed Final Pretrail [sic] Order" (Filing No. 60 ), and "2 nd Objection to Defendant Objection" (Filing No. 63 ) are granted only to the extent that the final pretrial conference in this matter, currently scheduled for March 14, 2013, is cancelled. The conference may be rescheduled after the resolution of defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerK's office is directed to cancel the final pretrial conference in this matter, currently scheduled for March 14, 2013. Defendant's Objections to plaintiff's Objections (Filing Nos. 54 and 61 ) are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
GARY LAMONT ABRAHAM,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DOUGLAS COUNTY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)

8:11CV302

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’
numerous Objections and “Objections to Objections.”
53, 54, 60, 61, and 63.)

(Filing Nos.

Also pending are plaintiff’s “Motion

for Hearing and Fair Trial” and “Motion to Suspend or Hold in
Abeyance All Proceedings.”

(Filing Nos. 57 and 59.)

Upon

careful consideration,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The Court construes plaintiff’s December 6, 2012,

Objection (Filing No. 53) as a response to defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment.
2.

The clerk’s office is directed to update the

docket sheet to reflect that Filing Number 53 is a response to
defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
3.

For the reasons explained to plaintiff in the

Court’s November 27, 2012, Memorandum and Order, plaintiff’s
“Motion for Hearing and Fair Trial” (Filing No. 57) is denied.

4.

Plaintiff’s “Motion to Suspend or Hold in Abeyance

All Proceedings” (Filing No. 59), “Objections to Defendant
Proposed Final Pretrail [sic] Order” (Filing No. 60), and “2nd
Objection to Defendant Objection” (Filing No. 63) are granted
only to the extent that the final pretrial conference in this
matter, currently scheduled for March 14, 2013, is cancelled.
The conference may be rescheduled after the resolution of
defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
5.

The clerk’s office is directed to cancel the final

pretrial conference in this matter, currently scheduled for March
14, 2013.
6.

Defendant’s Objections to plaintiff’s Objections

(Filing Nos. 54 and 61) are denied.
DATED this 20th day of February, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or
Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska
does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third
parties or the services or products they provide on their Web
sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these
third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any
hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion
of the Court.
-2-