Gonzalez v. City of Omaha et al

Filing 32

ORDER- On or before January 31, 2012, the plaintiffs shall file their motion for attorneys fees. The defendants shall have to on or before February 27, 2012, to file a response. The plaintiffs shall have to on or before March 5, 2012, in which to file anyreply. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ARMANDO PLIEGO GONZALEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:11CV335 ORDER This matter is before the court following a conference with counsel on December 19, 2011. The plaintiffs were represented by Bernard J. Glaser, Jr., and David G. Sigale. The defendants were represented by Michelle A. Peters. The parties agreed the only issue remaining in this matter is that of attorney’s fees. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. On or before January 31, 2012, the plaintiffs shall file their motion for attorney’s fees. 2. The defendants shall have to on or before February 27, 2012, to file a response. 3. The plaintiffs shall have to on or before March 5, 2012, in which to file any reply. DATED this 19th day of December, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?