Gonzalez v. City of Omaha et al

Filing 32

ORDER- On or before January 31, 2012, the plaintiffs shall file their motion for attorneys fees. The defendants shall have to on or before February 27, 2012, to file a response. The plaintiffs shall have to on or before March 5, 2012, in which to file anyreply. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ARMANDO PLIEGO GONZALEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:11CV335
ORDER

This matter is before the court following a conference with counsel on December
19, 2011. The plaintiffs were represented by Bernard J. Glaser, Jr., and David G. Sigale.
The defendants were represented by Michelle A. Peters. The parties agreed the only issue
remaining in this matter is that of attorney’s fees. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:
1.

On or before January 31, 2012, the plaintiffs shall file their motion for

attorney’s fees.
2.

The defendants shall have to on or before February 27, 2012, to file a

response.
3.

The plaintiffs shall have to on or before March 5, 2012, in which to file any

reply.
DATED this 19th day of December, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge