Blair v. Douglas County et al

Filing 136

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The plaintiff shall have until April 4, 2014, to respond to the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 131 ) on the basis of the Eleventh Amendment and res judicata. Plaintiff shall respond to other argume nts; however, in the event the plaintiff believes it is necessary to obtain additional discovery to respond to the defendant's other grounds for summary judgment, the plaintiff shall set forth in his response the specific discovery required, why the discovery is required, and why the discovery has not been accomplished previously. The defendant may file a reply on or before April 14, 2014. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA STEVEN R. BLAIR, Plaintiff, 8:11CV349 vs. ORDER DOUGLAS COUNTY, Defendant. On March 6, 2014, the parties appeared before the court for a planning conference. Steven R. Blair, pro se, was present for the conference. Sandra K. Connolly represented the defendant, Douglas County. Following a discussion of the case, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff shall have until April 4, 2014, to respond to the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 131) on the basis of the Eleventh Amendment and res judicata. Plaintiff shall respond to other arguments; however, in the event the plaintiff believes it is necessary to obtain additional discovery to respond to the defendant’s other grounds for summary judgment, the plaintiff shall set forth in his response the specific discovery required, why the discovery is required, and why the discovery has not been accomplished previously. 2. The defendant may file a reply on or before April 14, 2014. Dated this 6th day of March, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?