Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The Timken Company et al

Filing 64

ORDER - The Stipulation of the parties, filing 63 , is approved and adopted. The plaintiff shall have until February 22, 2013, to identify all expert witnesses and serve the statement required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) regarding each expert witne ss it expects to call to testify at trial. The defendants shall have until March 22, 2013, to identify all expert witnesses and serve the statement required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) regarding each expert witness they expect to call to testify at trial. Plaintiff's deadline to serve rebuttal expert reports, if any, remains on April 19, 2013. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
THE TIMKEN COMPANY and
)
MERIDIAN RAIL ACQUISITION
)
CORP., d/b/a GREENBRIER RAIL )
SERVICES,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)

8:11CV373

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the stipulation to
extend expert disclosure deadline (Filing No. 63).

The Court

finds the stipulation should be approved and adopted.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) The stipulation of the parties is approved and
adopted.
2)

The plaintiff shall have until February 22, 2013,

to identify all expert witnesses and serve the statement required
by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) regarding each expert witness it expects
to call to testify at trial.
3) The defendants shall have until March 22, 2013, to
identify all expert witnesses and serve the statement required by
Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) regarding each expert witness they expect
to call to testify at trial.

4) Plaintiff’s deadline to serve rebuttal expert
reports, if any, remains on April 19, 2013.
DATED this 28th day of September, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court

-2-