North American Company for Life and Health Insurance v. Ballard et al

Filing 41

ORDER - The parties' Motion to Amend Scheduling Order for Progression of Case (Filing No. 40 ) is granted. The deadlines, including the trial setting, contained in the September 24, 2012, Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of a Civil Case (Filing No. 30 ) are canceled. The court will hold a telephone planning conference, rather than the Final Pretrial Conference, at 10:00 a.m. on February 22, 2013. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the conference with the undersigned magistrate judge and participating counsel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA TERESA BALLARD, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Evelyn Rose Cain, 8:11CV411 Plaintiff, ORDER vs. PATRICK K. CAIN, Defendant. This matter is before the court on the parties’ Motion to Amend Scheduling Order for Progression of Case (Filing No. 40). The parties seek to continue the previously scheduled February 22, 2013, Final Pretrial Conference and other deadlines to explore settlement and complete discovery. For good cause shown, the motion is granted as set forth below, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties’ Motion to Amend Scheduling Order for Progression of Case (Filing No. 40) is granted. 2. The deadlines, including the trial setting, contained in the September 24, 2012, Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of a Civil Case (Filing No. 30) are canceled. 3. The court will hold a telephone planning conference, rather than the Final Pretrial Conference, at 10:00 a.m. on February 22, 2013. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the conference with the undersigned magistrate judge and participating counsel. Dated this 8th day of February, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?