Lopez v. ATM Network, Inc. et al

Filing 34

ORDER - The parties shall report to the court in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before the close of business on March 29, 2012, or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed upon them in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f). ( Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 3/29/2012.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ALEXANDRA LOPEZ, Plaintiff, vs. ATM NETWORK, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 8:11CV416 ORDER This matter is before the court sua sponte. On February 15, 2012, the court informed the parties by letter of their obligation to meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and to file a written report of their meeting. See Filing No. 30. The parties’ deadline for filing the report was March 16, 2012. However, no planning report has been filed to date. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The parties shall report to the court in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before the close of business on March 29, 2012, or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed upon them in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f). DATED this 21st day of March, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?