Door v. Douglas County Corrections Strom

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Memorandum and Order 7 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DUOP DOOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOUGLAS COUNTY CORRECTIONS
STROM, #2081,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 8:11CV428

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On February 13, 2012, the court
conducted an initial review of Plaintiff’s Complaint and found that it failed to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted. (Filing No. 7.) The court gave Plaintiff the opportunity
to amend his claims, but warned Plaintiff that if he failed to amend his Complaint by March
14, 2012, his Complaint “will be dismissed without further notice for failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted.” (Id. at CM/ECF p. 5.) Plaintiff has failed to file an
amended complaint.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed without
prejudice because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

2.

A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum
and Order; and

3.

The Clerk of the court is directed to place the “28USC1915(g)_STR” flag on
this matter.

DATED this 26th day of March, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites.

The U.S. District
Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third
parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no
agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility
for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work
or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.