Powers, et al v. Credit Management Services, Inc. et al
Filing
59
ORDER - The deadline for the plaintiffs to file any motion seeking certification of this case as a class action is vacated and will be re-established during the planning conference. The court will hold a planning conference within ten days following the court's ruling on the defendants' motions to dismiss (Filing Nos. 32 and 34 ) and for sanctions (Filing No. 37 ). Plaintiffs' counsel will arrange and initiate the telephone conference with all participating counsel and the court. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TEL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LAURA POWERS, NICHOLE PALMER,
and JASON PALMER,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CREDIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,)
DANA K. FRIES,
)
JESSICA L. V. PISKORSKI,
)
BRADY W. KEITH,
)
MICHAEL J. MORLEDGE, and
)
TESSA HERMANSON,
)
)
Defendants.
)
8:11CV436
ORDER
This matter is before the court after a telephone conference with counsel for the
parties on June 22, 2012. Pamela A. Car and William L. Reinbrecht represented the
plaintiffs and Christopher R. Morris and John M. Guthery, Jr., represented the defendants.
Based on the conversation with counsel, the initial progression order (Filing No. 28) is
amended as set forth below.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The deadline for the plaintiffs to file any motion seeking certification of this
case as a class action is vacated and will be re-established during the planning
conference.
2.
The court will hold a planning conference within ten days following the court's
ruling on the defendants’ motions to dismiss (Filing Nos. 32 and 34) and for sanctions
(Filing No. 37). Plaintiffs’ counsel will arrange and initiate the telephone conference with
all participating counsel and the court.
DATED this 22nd day of June, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?