Oppenheim v. Lampert

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's motion to amend (FilingNo. 5 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint on or before January 17, 2012. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party) (AOA)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ALEXANDER W. OPPENHEIM, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KEITH M. LAMPERT, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) 8:11CV437 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to amend (Filing No. 5). Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that courts should freely give a party leave to amend when justice so requires. The applicable standard is summarized in Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962), which states: If the underlying facts or circumstances relied upon by a plaintiff may be a proper subject of relief, he ought to be afforded an opportunity to test his claims on the merits. In the absence of any apparent reason -- such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, . . . undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of the allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc. -- the leave sought should, as the rules require, be freely given. Id. (internal quotations omitted). Although summons has been returned executed upon defendant, defendant has not yet responded. Moreover, plaintiff only seeks to amend the complaint to cite “additional case law” and correct “grammatical errors.” (Filing No. 5 at CM/ECF p. 1.) amend will be granted. Plaintiff’s motion to Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to amend (Filing No. 5) is granted. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint on or before January 17, 2012. DATED this 10th day of January, 2012. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court * This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?