Williams v. Raynor Rensch & Pfieffer et al
Filing
182
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiff's 178 MOTION for Docket Sheet is denied. Plaintiff's MOTION for Clarification 179 and 180 are granted to the extent that this Memorandum and Order provides plaintiff with clarification and are otherwise denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
SHANNON WILLIAMS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
REYNOR RENSCH & PFIEFFER,
)
TERRY HADDOCK, JOHN STUCK,
)
JOHN BRAZDA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
8:11CV446
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion
for Docket Sheet (Filing No. 178) and Motions for Clarification
(Filing Nos. 179 and 180).
In his Motion for Docket Sheet, plaintiff asks for a
copy of the docket sheet in this matter (Filing No. 178).
Plaintiff does not have the right to receive copies of documents
without payment, even if the Court granted him leave to proceed
in forma pauperis.
28 U.S.C. § 1915; see also Haymes v. Smith,
73 F.R.D. 572, 574 (W.D.N.Y. 1976) (“The generally recognized
rule is that a court may not authorize the commitment of federal
funds to underwrite the necessary expenditures of an indigent
civil litigant’s action.”) (citing Tyler v. Lark, 472 F.2d 1077
(8th Cir. 1973), other citations omitted).
If plaintiff requires
copies of court documents, he should contact the clerk of the
court to determine the proper method of requesting and paying for
copies.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Docket Sheet will be denied.
In his Motions for Clarification, plaintiff asks the
Court to clarify the status of his “Civil Complaint” in a
separate case (i.e. “Case No. 09-CR-457”) (Filing No. 179).
If
plaintiff seeks a status update in another case, he should file a
motion in that case.
Plaintiff also asks the Court to refer this
case to the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636 and to clarify
why this case is assigned to the undersigned Judge (Filing Nos.
179 and 180).
The Court refers plaintiff to NEGenR 1.4 for
information regarding the assignment of judges in this Court.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Docket Sheet (Filing No.
178) is denied.
2.
Plaintiff’s Motions for Clarification (Filing Nos.
179 and 180) are granted to the extent that this Memorandum and
Order provides plaintiff with clarification and are otherwise
denied.
DATED this 31st day of January, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
*
This opinion may contain hyper links to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for
the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services
or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third
parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any
hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not
affect the opinion of the court.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?