Struyk v. Holmes, Murphy & Associates, Inc.

Filing 72

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint and any and all claims set forth therein and the Counterclaim-Plaintiffs' Counterclaims and any and all claims set forth therein are all dismissed with prejudice, with each party to pay its own costs and fees. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JACK STRUYK, JR., THE KANSAS CITY SERIES OF LOCKTON COMPANIES, LLC, KATHLEEN FRIDHOLM, JANE DAMBROSIA, CYNTHIA CARLSON, DEBORAH RASMUSSEN, MARLYS GORSETH, and PATRICIA GALVIN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) HOLMES, MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, ) INC., an Iowa corporation, ) Defendant. ) ------------------------------------------------------ ) ) HOLMES, MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, ) INC., an Iowa corporation, and HMA, INC., ) an Iowa corporation, ) ) Counterclaim Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) JACK STRUYK, JR., THE KANSAS CITY ) SERIES OF LOCKTON COMPANIES, ) LLC, KATHLEEN FRIDHOLM, JANE ) DAMBROSIA, CYNTHIA CARLSON, ) DEBORAH RASMUSSEN, MARLYS ) GORSETH, and PATRICIA GALVIN, ) ) Counterclaim Defendants. Case No. 8:11-cv-3151 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE This matter is before the Court on the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal (filing No. 71) filed jointly by the parties, providing for the dismissal of any and all claims and counterclaims set forth therein with prejudice. The Court, having considered the filing, and being duly advised, finds that said stipulation should be approved. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint and any and all claims set forth therein and the Counterclaim-Plaintiffs’ Counterclaims and any and all claims set forth therein are all dismissed with prejudice, with each party to pay its own costs and fees. Date: August 15, 2012 BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?