Struyk v. Holmes, Murphy & Associates, Inc.
Filing
72
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint and any and all claims set forth therein and the Counterclaim-Plaintiffs' Counterclaims and any and all claims set forth therein are all dismissed with prejudice, with each party to pay its own costs and fees. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JACK STRUYK, JR., THE KANSAS
CITY SERIES OF LOCKTON
COMPANIES, LLC, KATHLEEN
FRIDHOLM, JANE DAMBROSIA,
CYNTHIA CARLSON, DEBORAH
RASMUSSEN, MARLYS GORSETH, and
PATRICIA GALVIN,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
HOLMES, MURPHY & ASSOCIATES,
)
INC., an Iowa corporation,
)
Defendant.
)
------------------------------------------------------ )
)
HOLMES, MURPHY & ASSOCIATES,
)
INC., an Iowa corporation, and HMA, INC., )
an Iowa corporation,
)
)
Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
JACK STRUYK, JR., THE KANSAS CITY )
SERIES OF LOCKTON COMPANIES,
)
LLC, KATHLEEN FRIDHOLM, JANE
)
DAMBROSIA, CYNTHIA CARLSON,
)
DEBORAH RASMUSSEN, MARLYS
)
GORSETH, and PATRICIA GALVIN,
)
)
Counterclaim Defendants.
Case No. 8:11-cv-3151
ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
This matter is before the Court on the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal (filing No. 71) filed
jointly by the parties, providing for the dismissal of any and all claims and counterclaims set
forth therein with prejudice. The Court, having considered the filing, and being duly advised,
finds that said stipulation should be approved.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint and any and all claims set forth
therein and the Counterclaim-Plaintiffs’ Counterclaims and any and all claims set forth therein
are all dismissed with prejudice, with each party to pay its own costs and fees.
Date: August 15, 2012
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?