Starks v. Wells Fargo, NA et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiff shall have until January 10, 2013, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to complete service of process. If Plaintiff does not respond, or if good cause is not shown, this action will be dis missed without prejudice and without further notice. ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 1/10/2013: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause why service of process was not completed.) Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KEVIN ISAAC STARKS,
WELLS FARGO, NA, WACHOVIA
WORLD SAVINGS INC., and ERIC H.
CASE NO. 8:12CV6
This matter is before the court on its own motion. After dismissal, and for good
cause shown, the court re-opened this matter on September 11, 2012. (Filing No. 13.) On
that date, the Clerk of the court sent four summons forms and four USM-285 forms to
Plaintiff so that he may complete service of process on Defendants. (Id.) However,
Plaintiff has not returned the forms, and has not completed service of process on
Defendants. Indeed, Plaintiff has taken no action in this matter since he sought to re-open
it on March 19, 2012. (See Docket Sheet.)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff shall have until January 10, 2013, to show cause why this case
should not be dismissed for failure to complete service of process. If Plaintiff
does not respond, or if good cause is not shown, this action will be dismissed
without prejudice and without further notice.
The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline
with the following text: January 10, 2013: deadline for Plaintiff to show
cause why service of process was not completed.
DATED this 11th day of December, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?