United States of America et al v. Beideck

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the court's filing fee and for failure to comply with a court order. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. In light of the Relator Plaintiff the United States of America's Notice of Declining to Intervene (Other) 7 , the Clerk of the court is directed to unseal this matter. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DUKHAN MUMIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
LYNN BEIDECK,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:12CV34

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On March 21, 2012, the
court entered a Memorandum and Order provisionally filing this matter but requiring
Plaintiff to either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the
$350.00 filing fee no later than April 20, 2012. (Filing No. 5.) The court warned
Plaintiff that failure to comply with its Memorandum and Order would result in
dismissal of this matter without further notice. (Id.) Plaintiff has not paid the $350.00
filing fee or filed any other response to the court’s previous Memorandum and Order.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

This matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the court’s

filing fee and for failure to comply with a court order.
2.

A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this

Memorandum and Order.
3.

In light of the Relator Plaintiff the United States of America’s Notice of

Declining to Intervene (filing no. 7), the Clerk of the court is directed to unseal this
matter.
Dated this 27 th day of April, 2012.

BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2