Williams v. Endicott Clay Products et al
Filing
46
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that: On or before July 19, 2013, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourt s.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this ord er, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The previously scheduled telephone conference is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MICHAEL WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
8:12CV49
vs.
ORDER
FIRST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., and
ENDICOTT CLAY PRODUCTS CO.,
Defendants.
Upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on June 19, 2013, by
Michael B. Kratville, attorney for the plaintiff,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
On or before July 19, 2013, the parties shall electronically file a joint
stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the
Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will
fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply
with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without
prejudice.
2.
Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims
and the like) may be dismissed without further notice.
3.
The previously scheduled telephone conference is cancelled upon the
representation that this case is settled.
Dated this 19th day of June, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?