Omaha Construction Industry Pension Plan et al v. BN Service, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER- The plaintiffs shall take appropriate action against the defendant or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute on or before the close of business September 10, 2012. Show Cause Deadline set for 9/10/2012. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copies mailed )(MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA OMAHA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ) PENSION PLAN, Board of Trustees, ) and NORTH CENTRAL STATES ) REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) BN SERVICE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) 8:12CV85 ORDER This matter is before the court sua sponte, pursuant to NECivR 41.2, which states in pertinent part: “At any time, a case not being prosecuted with reasonable diligence may be dismissed for lack of prosecution.” On July 26, 2012, a clerk’s entry of default was entered against the defendant. See Filing No. 15. The defendant failed to enter an appearance or seek the clerk’s entry of default be set aside. Further, the plaintiffs failed to take any additional action against the defendant. In any event, it remains the plaintiffs’ duty to go forward in prosecuting the case by, for example, filing a motion for entry of judgment against the defendant, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) and NECivR 55.1(b) or (c). Alternatively, the plaintiffs may voluntarily dismiss the action against the defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) or be subject to involuntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: The plaintiffs shall take appropriate action against the defendant or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute on or before the close of business September 10, 2012. DATED this 27th day of August, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?