Phil-Insul Corp. v. Reward Wall Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
235
ORDER - The deadlines in the Final Progression Order (Filing No. 162 ) are suspended pending the court's rulings on the Motion for Summary Judgement (Filing No. 205 ) and the Motion for Partial Summary Judgement (Filing No. 218 ). Plainti ff shall have to on or before January 18, 2013, in which to respond to the Motion for Partial Summary Judgement (Filing No. 218 ). Defendant Reward Wall Systems, Inc., shall have to on or before January 31, 2013, to reply. Within ten (10) calenda r days after the court's ruling on the pending motions for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 205 and 218 ), plaintiff shall arrange and initiate a telephone conference with counsel for all parties and the undersigned magistrate judge to schedul e this matter for trial. Any defendant seeking a determination of a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 (Filing No. 72 transferred from the Eastern District of Texas) shall file its request on or before December 27, 2012. Movants may supplement the motion, briefing, and supporting documentation on or before January 11, 2013. Any response may be supplemented on or before January 18, 2013. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PHIL-INSUL CORP., d/b/a,
INTEGRASPEC,
Plaintiff,
v.
REWARD WALL SYSTEMS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:12CV91
ORDER
This mater is before the court following a status conference on December 21, 2012.
Participating in the telephone conference were: Paul Adams and John P. Passarelli for
plaintiff Phil-Insul Corp.; Michael R. Annis for defendant Reward Wall Systems, Inc.; David
M. Sullivan for defendant BuildBlock Building Systems; James R. Sobieraj for defendant
Amvic Corporation; and Aaron M. Johnson for defendants Nudura Corporation and
Polyform, A.G.P. Following a discussion with counsel,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The deadlines in the Final Progression Order (Filing No. 162) are suspended
pending the court’s rulings on the Motion for Summary Judgement (Filing No. 205) and the
Motion for Partial Summary Judgement (Filing No. 218).
2.
Plaintiff shall have to on or before January 18, 2013, in which to respond
to the Motion for Partial Summary Judgement (Filing No. 218). Defendant Reward Wall
Systems, Inc., shall have to on or before January 31, 2013, to reply.
3.
Within ten (10) calendar days after the court’s ruling on the pending motions
for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 205 and 218), plaintiff shall arrange and initiate a
telephone conference with counsel for all parties and the undersigned magistrate judge to
schedule this matter for trial.
4.
Any defendant seeking a determination of a Motion for Sanctions pursuant
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 (Filing No. 72 transferred from the Eastern District
of Texas) shall file its request on or before December 27, 2012.
Movants may
supplement the motion, briefing, and supporting documentation on or before January 11,
2013. Any response may be supplemented on or before January 18, 2013.
DATED this 21st day of December, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?