Tyler v. Heavican et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 11 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MICHAEL HEAVICAN, WRIGHT,
MCCORMACK, STEPHENS, and
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Appeal In
Forma Pauperis. (Filing No. 11.) On May 1, 2012, the court dismissed Plaintiff’s
claims without prejudice and entered judgment against Plaintiff. (Filing Nos. 8 and
9.) On May 4, 2012, Plaintiff filed a timely Notice of Appeal of the court’s
Judgment. (Filing No. 10. ) Plaintiff is not a prisoner and has previously been granted
leave to proceed IFP in this matter. (Filing No. 6.)
As set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3):
(a) Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ....
(3) Prior Approval. A party who was permitted to proceed
in forma pauperis in the district-court action, or who was determined to
be financially unable to obtain an adequate defense in a criminal case,
may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization,
unless the district court – before or after the notice of appeal is filed–
certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith or finds that the party
is not otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. In that event, the
district court must state in writing its reasons for the certification or
The court finds that because Plaintiff proceeded IFP in the district court, he
may now “proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization.”
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (filing no. 11)
The Clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals with a copy of
this Memorandum and Order.
All other pending motions are denied.
DATED this 11th day of May, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?