Davis v. State of Nebraska
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Return of Cause Stated, liberally construed as a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (filing no. 16 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
STATE OF NEBRASKA,
This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s Motion for Return of Cause
Stated, which the court liberally construes as a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment,
filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). (Filing No. 16.) In his
Motion, Petitioner disagrees with the court’s August 27, 2012, Memorandum and
Order and Judgment which dismissed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus because
it was clear that he was not in state custody and had not alleged that he was being
held in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States. (Filing
Nos. 14 and 15.) The court has carefully reviewed Petitioner’s Motion and finds no
good cause to amend or alter any portion of its August 27, 2012, Memorandum and
Order or Judgment.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner’s Motion for Return of Cause
Stated, liberally construed as a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (filing no. 16)
DATED this 10th day of October, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?