Prism Technologies v. AT&T et al

Filing 477

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is before the Court on the objections 467 of plaintiff Prism regarding certain trialissues. Plaintiff's objection regarding the Frankel Reference is sustained, and it is excluded. Plaintiff's objec tion regarding Mr. Taylor is sustained, and he may not offer testimony on the Fox reference. Plaintiff's objection regarding Mr. Neal is overruled. The Court's order (Filing No. 421) stands. The Court defers the question of Mr. Greendyk until the time of his testimony. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (ADB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)

8:12CV122

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the objections
(Filing No. 467) of plaintiff Prism regarding certain trial
issues.

The issues regard whether AT&T may present the Frankel

Reference at trial, whether Mr. Taylor may testify regarding the
Fox Reference, whether AT&T may call Mr. Neal, and whether Mr.
Greendyk may testify regarding a technical document.
As to Mr. Greendyk, the Court wishes to have a better
understanding of how Mr. Greendyk intends to testify and whether
his testimony will have the requisite foundation.

The Court

finds as follows.
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Plaintiff’s objection regarding the Frankel
Reference is sustained, and it is excluded.
2) Plaintiff’s objection regarding Mr. Taylor is
sustained, and he may not offer testimony on the Fox reference.

3) Plaintiff’s objection regarding Mr. Neal is
overruled.

The Court’s order (Filing No. 421) stands.
4) The Court defers the question of Mr. Greendyk until

the time of his testimony.
DATED this 21st day of October, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court

-2-