Prism Technologies v. AT&T et al
Filing
500
ORDER granting 492 request for transcript (Non-Party) and AT&T's request for transcript 499 at the expense of each ordering party; directing court reporter to transcribe the entirety of the trial held October 14-October 23, 2014; granting AT&T's unopposed motion to seal the trial transcript 493 and court reporter is permitted to sell and disseminate copies of this unredacted sealed transcript only to the parties and non-parties pursuant to the terms and conditions of the joint stipulation 496 . Directions on redaction set forth. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (CCB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
8:12CV122
ORDER
Prism Technologies, LLC, AT&T Mobility, LLC, and nonparties Sprint Spectrum L.P., T-Mobile USA, Inc., U.S. Cellular
Corp., and Cellco Partnership (d/b/a Verizon Wireless) came
before the Court on the non-parties’ request for transcript
(Filing No. 492), AT&T’s unopposed motion to seal the trial
transcript (Filing No. 493), and AT&T’s request for transcript
(Filing No. 499).
After conference with counsel,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) The court reporter shall transcribe the entirety of
the trial held October 14-October 23, 2014, inclusive, including
all voir dire, opening statements, testimony, argument, and all
other proceedings, whether or not recorded in the presence of the
jury, at the expense of each ordering party.
2) The unredacted transcript shall be permanently
sealed.
The court reporter is permitted to sell and disseminate
copies of this unredacted sealed transcript only to the parties
and non-parties pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Joint
Stipulation (Filing No. 496), to wit:
Prism Technologies, AT&T
Mobility, LLC, Sprint Spectrum L.P., T-Mobile USA, Inc., U.S.
Cellular Corp., and Cellco Partnership.
3) The court reporter is prohibited from selling the
unredacted sealed transcript to any other individual or entity.
The parties and non-parties have separately agreed on
restrictions to the dissemination of this transcript.
Sprint
Spectrum L.P., T-Mobile USA, Inc., U.S. Cellular Corp., and
Cellco Partnership are all permitted to immediately use this
transcript in each of their respective cases currently pending
before this Court.1
4) Within seven (7) days of the court reporter
providing the completed unredacted transcript to AT&T Mobility,
AT&T must serve proposed redactions on counsel for Prism
Technologies, LLC, Sprint Spectrum L.P., T-Mobile USA, Inc., U.S.
Cellular Corp., and Cellco Partnership.
5) Within seven (7) days of receiving AT&T’s proposed
redactions, the requesting non-parties (and Prism) must serve on
1
Prism Technologies, LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P., 8:12CV123;
Prism Technologies, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., 8:12CV124; Prism
Technologies, LLC v. U.S. Cellular Corp., 8:12CV125; Prism
Technologies, LLC v. Cellco Partnership, 8:12CV126).
-2-
AT&T Mobility, LLC, their objections, if any, to AT&T’s proposed
redactions.
6) Also within seven (7) days of receiving AT&T’s
proposed redactions, the parties and non-parties shall jointly
notify the Court of AT&T’s proposed redactions and the
objections, if any, the requesting parties and/or non-parties
have to those proposed redactions.
7) The Court will review the proposed redactions and
either approve or reject them.
To the extent Court approves any
redactions proposed by AT&T, the court reporter will redact from
the permanently sealed transcript those portions of the
transcript that were approved by the Court.
The court reporter
shall file the final, redacted transcript with the Court.
DATED this 30th day of January, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?