Prism Technologies v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
Filing
256
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the respective motions are granted. The defendants shall have until December 23, 2014, to respond to Prism's motion for leave to serve supplemental and/or expert reports. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.,
)
d/b/a SPRINT PCS,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
T-MOBILE USA, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES CELLULAR
)
CORPORATION, d/b/a U.S.
)
CELLULAR,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a
)
VERIZON WIRELESS,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
8:12CV123
8:12CV124
8:12CV125
8:12CV126
ORDER
-1-
This matter is before the Court on the motions to
extend time to respond to Prism’s motion for leave (Filing No.
255 in 8:12CV123; Filing No. 268 in 8:12CV124; Filing No. 251 in
8:12CV125; and Filing No. 238 in 8:12CV126).
motions should be granted.
The Court finds the
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the respective motions are granted.
The defendants shall have until December 23, 2014, to respond to
Prism’s motion for leave to serve supplemental and/or expert
reports.
DATED this 11th day of December, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?