Prism Technologies v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.

Filing 542

ORDER granting motion, filing 540 . Prism's reply brief in support of its motion for prejudgment and post judgment interest shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. Prism's reply brief in support of its motion for an accounting an d ongoing royalties shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. Sprint's reply in support of its motion for new trial shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. Sprint's reply brief in support of its renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no infringement shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. The parties' request for redaction of transcript shall be due on or before August 31, 2015. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., D/B/A ) SPRINT PCS, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) 8:12CV123 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the joint motion for extension of certain deadlines (Filing No. 540). the motion should be granted. The Court finds Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Prism’s reply brief in support of its motion for prejudgment and post judgment interest shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. 2) Prism’s reply brief in support of its motion for an accounting and ongoing royalties shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. 3) Sprint’s reply in support of its motion for new trial shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. 4) Sprint’s reply brief in support of its renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no infringement shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. 5) The parties’ request for redaction of transcript shall be due on or before August 31, 2015. DATED this 31st day of August, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lyle E. Strom ____________________________ LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?