Prism Technologies v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
Filing
542
ORDER granting motion, filing 540 . Prism's reply brief in support of its motion for prejudgment and post judgment interest shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. Prism's reply brief in support of its motion for an accounting an d ongoing royalties shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. Sprint's reply in support of its motion for new trial shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. Sprint's reply brief in support of its renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law of no infringement shall be due on or before September 10, 2015. The parties' request for redaction of transcript shall be due on or before August 31, 2015. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., D/B/A
)
SPRINT PCS,
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
8:12CV123
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the joint motion for
extension of certain deadlines (Filing No. 540).
the motion should be granted.
The Court finds
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Prism’s reply brief in support of its motion for
prejudgment and post judgment interest shall be due on or before
September 10, 2015.
2) Prism’s reply brief in support of its motion for an
accounting and ongoing royalties shall be due on or before
September 10, 2015.
3) Sprint’s reply in support of its motion for new
trial shall be due on or before September 10, 2015.
4) Sprint’s reply brief in support of its renewed
motion for judgment as a matter of law of no infringement shall
be due on or before September 10, 2015.
5) The parties’ request for redaction of transcript
shall be due on or before August 31, 2015.
DATED this 31st day of August, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?