Goodwin v. Oxford Law, LLC et al
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - In accordance with the parties' joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (filing no. 30 ), this matter is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. All pending motions are denied as moot. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
NATHANIEL GOODWIN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
OXFORD LAW, LLC, PINNACLE
)
CREDIT SERVICES, LLC,
)
MICHAEL MCGUIGAN, and JOHN )
DOE 1-10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
8:12CV154
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on the parties’ joint Stipulation for Dismissal
With Prejudice. (Filing No. 30.) The parties have settled this matter and have
stipulated and agreed to dismissal with prejudice. (Id.) The court accepts the Joint
Stipulation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
In accordance with the parties’ joint Stipulation for Dismissal With
Prejudice (filing no. 30), this matter is dismissed with prejudice.
2.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this
Memorandum and Order.
3.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
DATED this 13th day of November, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?