Evans v. Nebr Beef
Filing
59
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The defendant's Motion to Compel and for Additional Time to Complete Discovery (Filing No. 58 ) is held in abeyance pending the plaintiff's response. The plaintiff shall have until the close of business on Novemb er 4, 2013, to respond to the defendant's motion by filing a brief. The parties' discovery deadline will be re-scheduled upon resolution of the defendant's motion to compel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CHARLES EVANS, III,
Plaintiff,
8:12CV161
vs.
ORDER
NEBRASKA BEEF, LTD.,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s Motion to Compel and for
Additional Time to Complete Discovery (Filing No. 58).
The defendant states the
plaintiff failed to appear for his October 7, 2013, deposition and did not cooperate with
the defendant to reschedule the deposition. Additionally, the defendant states the
plaintiff failed to timely respond to Interrogatories and Requests for Production served
by the defendant on September 9, 2013. The defendant seeks a court order compelling
the plaintiff to appear for a deposition and respond to the written discovery. Finally, the
defendant requests an extension of the October 17, 2013, discovery deadline to resolve
the current outstanding discovery issues. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The defendant’s Motion to Compel and for Additional Time to Complete
Discovery (Filing No. 58) is held in abeyance pending the plaintiff’s response.
2.
The plaintiff shall have until the close of business on November 4, 2013,
to respond to the defendant’s motion by filing a brief.
3.
The parties’ discovery deadline will be re-scheduled upon resolution of the
defendant’s motion to compel.
Dated this 16th day of October, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?