Ashford v. City of Omaha et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiff shall have until June 21, 2012, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 6/21/2012: deadline for informing court of new address.) Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DEVIN ASHFORD,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF OMAHA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:12CV166

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On May 11, 2012, the Clerk
of the court sent a Notice and Order to Plaintiff at his last known address. (Filing
Nos. 3 and 4.) On May 18, 2012, those documents were returned to the court as
undeliverable, and no forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 5.) Plaintiff
has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See
NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform
the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this
court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff shall have until June 21, 2012, to apprise the court of his
current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice
and without further notice.
2.
The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline in this case using the following text: June 21, 2012: deadline for informing
court of new address.
DATED this 23rd day of May, 2012.

BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2