Wagner v. McHugh et al

Filing 100

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 96 defendant's Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act.The plaintiff's motion, (Filing No. 97 ), is granted in part and denied in part as follows:- a. Plaintiff's request for a copy of the Court's Order dated February 3, 2014 is granted. The clerk shall send a copy of filing 94 to the plaintiff.- b. Plaintiff's motion to deny the "Defendant's 'Joint' Motion for Progression Order" is denie d as moot. The defendants may have presented a proposed joint motion to the plaintiff for his consideration, but it was never filed with the court.- c. Plaintiff's request for a progression order which permits written discovery (Interrogator ies and Requests for Production) is granted as set forth in the progression order entered on March 20, 2014, (Filing No. 99 ).- d. Plaintiff's request to depose at least 12 witnesses before he is deposed by the defendant is denied. The part ies may conduct depositions in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this court's local rules, and the court's orders herein. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party with filing 94 .)(JAB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LAURENCE R. WAGNER, Plaintiff, 8:12CV174 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THE HONORABLE JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army; et. al; Defendants. IT IS ORDERED: 1) The defendants’ motion to file the MSPB Administrative Record as a restricted access document, (Filing No. 96), is granted. 2) The plaintiff’s motion, (Filing No. 97), is granted in part and denied in part as follows: a. Plaintiff’s request for a copy of the Court’s Order dated February 3, 2014 is granted. The clerk shall send a copy of filing 94 to the plaintiff. b. Plaintiff’s motion to deny the “Defendant's ‘Joint’ Motion for Progression Order” is denied as moot. The defendants may have presented a proposed joint motion to the plaintiff for his consideration, but it was never filed with the court. c. Plaintiff’s request for a progression order which permits written discovery (Interrogatories and Requests for Production) is granted as set forth in the progression order entered on March 20, 2014, (Filing No. 99). d. Plaintiff’s request to depose at least 12 witnesses before he is deposed by the defendant is denied. The parties may conduct depositions in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this court’s local rules, and the court’s orders herein. March 21, 2014 BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?