Lombardo v. Barrett Property Management et al
PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 23 Motion for Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TCL )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BARRETT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,
an unincorporated entity, JOHN C.
BARRETT, individually, and VERLA KAY
The parties expect the disclosure of documents in this case may involve the exchange of
sensitive information, including, inter alia, medical information, financial and tax information,
other personal or business financial information, personally identifying information, and/or other
information that is necessary to protect from public disclosure. Accordingly, the parties stipulate
and agree to, and the Court finds good cause for, entry of the foregoing Protective Order
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c).
It is hereby ordered that:
Treatment of Confidential Information
All documents containing information that is to be considered confidential
information pursuant to this Order shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL” in large letters on the
first page and on each page of the document on which confidential information is contained. If a
multi-page document is deemed to be confidential in its entirety, a party may so indicate by
marking “CONFIDENTIAL – ENTIRE DOCUMENT” in large letters of the first page of the
Any party involved in this case, or counsel for such party, may designate as
confidential any document, testimony, or information disclosed, or to be disclosed, or portion
thereof, if the material includes sensitive information. Such designation shall, without more,
subject the information produced or provided under said designation to the provisions of this
Any party in this case, or counsel for such party, may designate as confidential its
responses to interrogatories by labeling each response “CONFIDENTIAL.”
Counsel for any party in this case may designate deposition testimony or any
portion of deposition testimony as confidential by advising the court reporter and counsel of such
designation during the course of the deposition.
Whenever any material designated as confidential is identified as an exhibit in the
above-captioned case, it shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL” and it shall be subject to all of the
requirements of this Confidentiality Agreement.
Inadvertent failure to designate a document as “CONFIDENTIAL” may be
corrected by supplemental written notice given as soon as practicable.
The parties must have a good-faith basis in fact and law to designate the material
as confidential. For example, the parties will not designate any publicly-available material as
The parties shall act in good faith when determining whether any documents they
intend to disclose may contain confidential information and shall make a good-faith effort to
designate any such material as being “Confidential,” including but not limited to social security
numbers and medical/healthcare-related information.
The parties shall treat as confidential any information related to the medical
history and/or treatment of Plaintiff regardless of the method by which such information was
obtained and regardless of whether such information has been disclosed in any manner prior to
the date of this Order. Without limiting the foregoing, any of the parties’ discovery requests or
responses that reference, contain, or attach information or documents related to such medical
history and/or treatment are hereby designated as confidential and subject to the provisions of
this Order. The fact that such information is not marked as “Confidential” or that it was received
by a third party or disclosed prior to the entry of this Protective Order shall not alter the parties’
obligations under this paragraph.
If any party objects to the designation of any information as confidential, that
party shall meet and confer with opposing counsel within ten (10) business days of receipt of this
objection in an effort to resolve any such dispute. If the parties are unable to resolve such
dispute, the party designating the material as confidential may move to have the Court declare
the contested information confidential.
Confidential information includes all material designated confidential, pursuant to
the terms of this Order, as well as summaries and compilations derived from such confidential
materials, including but not limited to charts, tables, graphs, and models.
If non-confidential information is contained in or otherwise derived from
confidential materials, any portion that consists solely of non-confidential information shall not
be confidential for purposes of this Order.
In any judicial proceeding in which confidential information may become a part
of a written submission to the Court, the parties will (1) delete the confidential information or (2)
file the written submission as “restricted” through the ECF filing system.
If confidential testimony or information is contained in the body of any filings or
submissions to this Court (e.g., if confidential material is directly quoted or summarized), the
entire filing or submission shall be filed as “restricted” through the ECF filing system.
Access to confidential information and documents shall be limited to individuals
who must handle those documents for purposes of this litigation. Individuals authorized to
handle confidential information and documents (hereinafter “qualified persons”) are as follows:
The Court and officers of the Court;
Court reporters and their assistants and administrative staff;
Plaintiff and counsel for Plaintiff, including attorneys, paralegals,
administrative staff, or contractors employed or contracted by Plaintiff’s counsel;
Defendants and counsel for Defendants, including attorneys, paralegals,
administrative staff, or contractors employed or contracted by Defendants’ counsel;
Any mediator used to attempt resolution of this litigation;
Witnesses or potential witnesses (and their counsel) in preparation for or
during the course of depositions, hearings, interviews, or trial in this action; and
Experts and consultants (including independent experts and consultants
and employees or clerical assistants of said experts) who are employed, retained, or otherwise
consulted by counsel or a party for the purpose of analyzing data, conducting studies, or
providing opinions to assist in this litigation.
All contractors, witnesses, experts, and consultants who will review confidential
information must first execute the Acknowledgment of Confidentiality Agreement attached as
Exhibit A, stating that they will abide by the terms of this agreement. For all witnesses which
the parties are required to disclose, a copy of this agreement shall be provided to opposing
counsel no later than the disclosure of the witness list for trial.
The “qualified persons” identified in paragraph 14 shall not permit disclosure of
confidential information to anyone who is not also a “qualified person.” Unless counsel of
record for the party producing the confidential information consents in writing to any other use,
such information shall be used solely in connection with the prosecution or defense of the action.
Except as provided for herein, no person having access to confidential
information shall make public disclosures of that material without further order of this Court.
No party to the above-captioned case, for itself or any other person acting on its
behalf, shall make more copies of any confidential material than are reasonably necessary to
conduct this litigation.
Upon conclusion of this case, including any subsequent appeals, all originals and
copies of confidential material (and all summaries thereof) shall be returned to the producing
party or the producing party’s counsel or representative or destroyed, unless: (i) otherwise
ordered by the Court for good cause shown, (ii) the return or destruction of such materials is
prohibited by law, or (iii) the document has been filed with the Court or used as an exhibit.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the parties to the above-
captioned case shall have no obligation under this Order with respect to information that:
is or becomes publicly available (except as by unauthorized disclosure); or
is received from a third-party who is rightfully in possession of such
information and who has the right to disclose it.
This Order in no way alters or supersedes the parties’ responsibilities under the E-
Government Act of 2002, this Court’s Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures, or any other
applicable confidentiality laws, rules or regulations.
Any party to the above-captioned case may petition this Court concerning a
violation of this Order and request any available remedies, including, but not limited to,
Entering into, agreeing to, and/or complying with the terms of this Order shall
operate as an admission that any particular discovery material constitutes,
contains, or reflects confidential matter;
prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the production of
documents or information it considers non-discoverable, or to seek a Court determination
whether particular discovery materials should be produced;
prejudice a party from seeking modification or recision of this
Confidentiality Agreement; or
prejudice a party from seeking further protection of any confidential
Nothing in this Order limits the parties’ right to seek modification of this Order or
to apply for additional protective orders as may become necessary due to a change in
circumstances or for other good cause shown.
Except as otherwise provided herein, the restrictions and obligations provided in
this Order shall not terminate upon the conclusion of this lawsuit but shall continue subject to
order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 7th day of December, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER
I, _______________________, have read and fully understand the Agreed Protective
Order filed in Marc Lombardo v. Barrett Property Management, et al., Civil Action No.
8:12CV189 (D. Neb.). I am familiar with and agree to comply with and be bound by the
provisions of said Order and submit myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska, or any other court having jurisdiction over the matters in this
lawsuit, for any proceedings with respect to said Order. I will not divulge to persons other than
those specifically authorized by paragraph 14 of the Order, or copy or use, except solely for the
purposes of this action, any material or information obtained pursuant to said Order except as
specifically permitted by the Order. I hereby agree that upon notification of the conclusion of
this case, including any subsequent appeals, I shall return all originals and copies of confidential
material (and all summaries thereof) to the producing party or the producing party’s counsel or
representative, or certify that all such documents have been destroyed.
(Home Address Continued)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?