Bussing v. Legent Clearing, LLC et al

Filing 47

MEMORANDUN AND ORDER granting #43 Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E- Government Act; granting #45 Motion to Allow Final Revised Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Motion to Restrict Access to All Pleadings. The plaintiff's Final Revised Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (filing no. 42) is deemed properly filed. The clerk of the court is directed to restrict Filing No. 42 in its entirety. In the event that the parties include the same, or similar, "non-public, sensitive information" in future filings, leave is given to the filing party, pursuant to NECivR 5.0.3, to file the document as restricted. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JULIE A. BUSSING,
Plaintiff,
v.
COR CLEARING, LLC, COR
SECURITIES HOLDINGS, Inc.,
CARLOS P. SALAS, in his
Individual Capacity, and
CHRISTOPHER L. FRANKEL, in
his Individual Capacity,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:12CV238

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER ON MOTION TO
PROVISIONALLY RESTRICT
ACCESS TO PLAINTIFF’S FINAL
REVISED BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND
EXHIBIT

This matter is before me on the defendants’ Motion to Provisionally Restrict
Access to Plaintiff’s Final Revised Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and
Exhibit (filing no. 43) and the plaintiff’s Motion to Allow Final Revised Brief in
Opposition to Motion to Dismiss & Motion to Restrict Access to All Pleadings (filing
no. 45). Julie A. Bussing’s motion seeks to file a Final Revised Brief in Opposition
to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Filing No. 42.) Further, both motions seek
restriction of Bussing’s Final Revised Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss. In accordance with my previous orders, and because the parties agree that
restriction is warranted, both motions are granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
the defendants’ Motion to Provisionally Restrict Access to Plaintiff’s
Final Revised Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Exhibit (filing no. 43)
and the plaintiff’s Motion to Allow Final Revised Brief in Opposition to Motion to
Dismiss & Motion to Restrict Access to All Pleadings (filing no. 45) are granted.

2.
the plaintiff’s Final Revised Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
(filing no. 42) is deemed properly filed.
3.

The clerk of the court is directed to restrict Filing No. 42 in its entirety.

4.
In the event that the parties include the same, or similar, “non-public,
sensitive information” in future filings, leave is given to the filing party, pursuant to
NECivR 5.0.3, to file the document as restricted.
Dated October 30, 2012.
BY THE COURT

__________________________________________
Warren K. Urbom
United States Senior District Judge

2