Jesse et al v. Jesse et al
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiffs are directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint on or before October 5, 2012; The Clerk of the court is directed to send to each Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit; The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: October 5, 2012: deadline for payment or filing of IFP application. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to each pro se party with Form AO240)(ADB, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
EDMOND R. JESSE, Husband and
wife in the Flesh and Blood as a
living man and woman in proper
person and the Martial Trust thereof,
and KATHLEEN M. JESSE,
Husband and wife in the Flesh and
Blood as a living man and woman in
proper person and the Martial Trust
thereof,
Plaintiffs,
v.
LANCE R. JESSE, Principal, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:12CV285
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on its own motion. The above-captioned matter
has been provisionally filed on August 9, 2012. (Filing No. 1.) However, due to
certain technical defects, the Complaint cannot be further processed until such defects
are corrected. To assure further consideration of the Complaint, Plaintiffs must
correct the defect listed below. FAILURE TO CORRECT THE DEFECT MAY
RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT.
Plaintiffs have failed to include the $350.00 filing fee. Plaintiffs have the
choice of either tendering the $350.00 fee to the Clerk of the court or submitting a
request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof.
If Plaintiffs choose to do the latter, the enclosed pauper’s forms should be completed
and returned to this court. Each Plaintiff must submit a request to proceed in
forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof.
In addition, the court notes that Plaintiffs have filed seven nearly-identical
matters in this court since August 1, 2012. However, Plaintiffs did not submit the
filing fee, or motions to proceed in forma pauperis, in any of these matters. In light
of this, the court will not accept any further new cases from Plaintiffs, or their
representatives, unless accompanied by the full filing fee or motions to proceed in
forma pauperis by each Plaintiff.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiffs are directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the
Complaint on or before October 5, 2012.
2.
Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in
dismissal of this matter without further notice.
3.
The Clerk of the court is directed to send to each Plaintiff the Form
AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit.
4.
The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline in this matter with the following text: October 5, 2012: deadline for payment
or filing of IFP application.
5.
In the event Plaintiffs or their representatives seek to file any additional
case in this court, the proposed complaint must be accompanied by the full filing fee
or motions to proceed in forma pauperis by each Plaintiff. If Plaintiffs do not comply
with this Memorandum and Order, the court will return the proposed complaint to
Plaintiffs without filing.
2
DATED this 7th day of September, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?