Tama Plastic Industry v. Pritchett Twine & Net Wrap, LLC et al

Filing 262

ORDER granting 261 Motion to Extend Deadlines in Case Management Plan. The deadlines set in the court's 9/18/13 Order 250 and the Revised Case Management Plan 249 referenced within, remain in effect with the exception of the amendments as set forth in this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA TAMA PLASTIC INDUSTRY, Plaintiff, vs. PRITCHETT TWINE & NET WRAP, LLC, and JOSEPH JERALD PRITCHETT, 8:12CV324 ORDER Defendants. This matter is before the court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines in Case Management Plan (Filing No. 261). The parties represent the defendants have recently retained new counsel who require additional time to become familiar with this matter. After consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines in Case Management Plan (Filing No. 261) is granted. 2. The deadlines set in the court’s September 18, 2013, Order (Filing No. 250), and the Revised Case Management Plan (Filing No. 249) referenced within, remain in effect with the exception of the following amendments: Event G. Exchange of Preliminary Constructions H. Meet and Confer re: Claim Construction F. Identification of Markman Experts F-1. If one party identified an expert, last day party who did not identify an expert may identify expert Parties Exchange Updated Document Production & Interrogatory Responses I. Tama Expert Report J. Pritchett Expert Report L. Settlement Conference w/ Private Mediator K. Joint Claim Construction Statement Date 10/21/2013 10/23/2013 10/25/2013 10/28/2013 10/25/2013 11/8/2013 11/15/2013 12/1/2013 11/20/2013 Deposition of Markman Experts M. Opening Markman Brief 11/25-26/2013 12/10/2013 Dated this 15th day of October, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?