Tama Plastic Industry v. Pritchett Twine & Net Wrap, LLC et al
Filing
262
ORDER granting 261 Motion to Extend Deadlines in Case Management Plan. The deadlines set in the court's 9/18/13 Order 250 and the Revised Case Management Plan 249 referenced within, remain in effect with the exception of the amendments as set forth in this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
TAMA PLASTIC INDUSTRY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
PRITCHETT TWINE & NET WRAP,
LLC, and JOSEPH JERALD
PRITCHETT,
8:12CV324
ORDER
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines in
Case Management Plan (Filing No. 261). The parties represent the defendants have
recently retained new counsel who require additional time to become familiar with this
matter. After consideration,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines in Case Management Plan
(Filing No. 261) is granted.
2.
The deadlines set in the court’s September 18, 2013, Order (Filing No.
250), and the Revised Case Management Plan (Filing No. 249) referenced within,
remain in effect with the exception of the following amendments:
Event
G. Exchange of Preliminary Constructions
H. Meet and Confer re: Claim Construction
F. Identification of Markman Experts
F-1. If one party identified an expert, last day
party who did not identify an expert may
identify expert
Parties Exchange Updated Document
Production & Interrogatory Responses
I. Tama Expert Report
J. Pritchett Expert Report
L. Settlement Conference w/ Private
Mediator
K. Joint Claim Construction Statement
Date
10/21/2013
10/23/2013
10/25/2013
10/28/2013
10/25/2013
11/8/2013
11/15/2013
12/1/2013
11/20/2013
Deposition of Markman Experts
M. Opening Markman Brief
11/25-26/2013
12/10/2013
Dated this 15th day of October, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?