Smith v. City of Omaha et al

Filing 158

ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 155) is granted effective November 17, 2014; prior to which time the plaintiff may engage new counsel. In the absence of new counsel entering an appearance on or before November 17, 2014, the plaintiff will be deemed proceeding pro se in 8:12CV330 and 8:12CV331 and Timothy L. Ashford will be relieved as counsel. The plaintiff's Motion for Mandatory Mediation (Filing No. 156) is denied. The plaintiff's Motion to Continue (Filing No. 157) is granted to the extent that the November 17, 2014, trial before Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon is continued sine die and will be rescheduled following a conference after November 17, 2014, with the plaintiff's new counse l or the plaintiff pro se and the defendants' counsel. The plaintiff shall have until November 17, 2014, to respond to the defendants' Motion in Limine (Filing No. 148). The defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filin g No. 84) and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment For Hayes and Swanson (Filing No. 138) are deemed submitted. No additional briefing is permitted. Member Cases: 8:12-cv-00330-JFB-TDT, 8:12-cv-00331-JFB-TDTOrdered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA TIFFANY SMITH, Plaintiff, 8:12CV330 vs. ORDER CITY OF OMAHA, a political subdivision existing and organized in the State of Nebraska; OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT; ALEX HAYES, Chief of Police, individually and in his official capacity; BENJAMIN EDWARDS, AAREN ANDERSON, and JERALD SWANSON, Omaha Police Officers, individually and in their official capacities; and JOHN DOES 1-100, Defendants. ______________________________ TIFFANY SMITH, as parent and natural guardian of Deante Smith, Plaintiff, 8:12CV331 vs. ORDER CITY OF OMAHA, a political subdivision existing and organized in the State of Nebraska; OMAHA POLICE DEPARTMENT; ALEX HAYES, Chief of Police, individually and in his official capacity; BENJAMIN EDWARDS, AAREN ANDERSON, and JERALD SWANSON, Omaha Police Officers, individually and in their official capacities; and JOHN DOES 1-100, Defendants. This matter is before the court following a pretrial conference with counsel on October 17, 2014. Timothy L. Ashford represented the plaintiff. The plaintiff and her husband were present for the conference. Thomas O. Mumgaard and Ryan J. Wiesen represented the defendants. The court discussed the status of the case and the plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 1551), Motion for Mandatory Mediation (Filing No. 156); and Motion to Continue (Filing No. 157). The plaintiff also moved for additional time to respond to the defendants’ Motion in Limine (Filing No. 148). Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 155) is granted effective November 17, 2014; prior to which time the plaintiff may engage new counsel. In the absence of new counsel entering an appearance on or before November 17, 2014, the plaintiff will be deemed proceeding pro se in 8:12CV330 and 8:12CV331 and Timothy L. Ashford will be relieved as counsel. 2. The plaintiff’s Motion for Mandatory Mediation (Filing No. 156) is denied. 3. The plaintiff’s Motion to Continue (Filing No. 157) is granted to the extent that the November 17, 2014, trial before Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon is continued sine die and will be rescheduled following a conference after November 17, 2014, with the plaintiff’s new counsel or the plaintiff pro se and the defendants’ counsel. 4. The plaintiff shall have until November 17, 2014, to respond to the defendants’ Motion in Limine (Filing No. 148). 5. The defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 84) and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment For Hayes and Swanson (Filing No. 138) are deemed submitted. No additional briefing is permitted. Dated this 17th day of October, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge 1 The court will cite to 8:12CV330 unless otherwise noted. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?