Tracy et al v. Telemetrix et al

Filing 271

ORDER granting 254 motion to stay and/or amend progression schedule and setting motion filing and response deadlines. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MICHAEL J. TRACY, et. al; Plaintiffs, 8:12CV359 vs. ORDER TELEMETRIX, Inc., et. al; Defendants. After conferring with counsel, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiffs’ motion to compel shall be filed on or before September 22, 2015. Any response shall be filed on or before October 2, 2015. No reply shall be filed absent leave of the court for good cause shown. 2) Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion to File a Third Amended Complaint (Filing No. 260) shall be filed on or before September 28, 2015. 3) The parties’ joint motion, (Filing No. 254), is granted as follows: a. The following deadlines in the current progression order, (Filing No. 220), are stayed pending further order of the court:     The deadline for filing motion to compel; The deadlines for serving complete expert disclosures; The deposition deadline; The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment; and  b. The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds. The trial and pretrial conference, and the telephonic conference set for December 1, 2015, remain scheduled as set forth in Filing No. 220. 5) Within ten days following the court’s ruling on Plaintiffs’ pending Amended Motion to File a Third Amended Complaint (Filing No. 260) and their anticipated motion to compel, counsel shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to discuss re-setting the case progression deadlines. September 15, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?