Tracy et al v. Telemetrix et al
Filing
271
ORDER granting 254 motion to stay and/or amend progression schedule and setting motion filing and response deadlines. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MICHAEL J. TRACY, et. al;
Plaintiffs,
8:12CV359
vs.
ORDER
TELEMETRIX, Inc., et. al;
Defendants.
After conferring with counsel,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel shall be filed on or before September 22, 2015.
Any response shall be filed on or before October 2, 2015. No reply shall be filed absent
leave of the court for good cause shown.
2)
Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion
to File a Third Amended Complaint (Filing No. 260) shall be filed on or before
September 28, 2015.
3)
The parties’ joint motion, (Filing No. 254), is granted as follows:
a.
The following deadlines in the current progression order, (Filing No.
220), are stayed pending further order of the court:
The deadline for filing motion to compel;
The deadlines for serving complete expert disclosures;
The deposition deadline;
The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for
summary judgment; and
b.
The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert
and related grounds.
The trial and pretrial conference, and the telephonic conference set
for December 1, 2015, remain scheduled as set forth in Filing No. 220.
5)
Within ten days following the court’s ruling on Plaintiffs’ pending
Amended Motion to File a Third Amended Complaint (Filing No. 260) and their
anticipated motion to compel, counsel shall contact the chambers of the undersigned
magistrate judge to discuss re-setting the case progression deadlines.
September 15, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?