Gilliland et al v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC

Filing 168

ORDER that Earl G. Greene, III, is stricken as an attorney of record for the defendant. Said attorney may apply to be readmitted as an attorney of record only after paying the 2015/2016 attorney assessment fee, as required by NEGenR 1.7(h). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MBM)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA TERRENCE N. GILLILAND, DENISE M. GILLILAND, and LUIS S. GALLEGOS, Plaintiffs, vs. 8:12CV384 ORDER HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY GROUP, LLC, Defendant. On October 30, 2012, the defendant removed this action from a state court. See Filing No. 1. The notice of removal listed Earl G. Greene, III, as counsel of record for the defendant. Id. The defendant has several attorneys listed as counsel of record. The court records show the Office of the Clerk of Court sent a notice on April 14, 2015, (Filing No. 165) to: Earl G. Greene, III, by electronic filing. The notice directed the attorney to pay the 2015/2016 attorney assessment fee, as required by NEGenR 1.7(h), within thirty days. As of the close of business on May 29, 2015, the attorney had not complied with the request set forth in the notice from the Office of the Clerk. On May 29, 2015, the court directed the attorney to pay the assessment or show cause why he could not comply with the rules of the court by June 15, 2015. Mr. Greene did not respond to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: Earl G. Greene, III, is stricken as an attorney of record for the defendant. Said attorney may apply to be readmitted as an attorney of record only after paying the 2015/2016 attorney assessment fee, as required by NEGenR 1.7(h). Dated this 18th day of June, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?