Mayhue v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until May 27, 2013, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. If Plaintiff does not respond, or if good cause is not shown, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further n otice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline with the following text: May 27, 2013: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause why service of process was not completed. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(AOA)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
REGINALD B. MAYHUE,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:12CV407

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. Plaintiff filed this matter on
November 27, 2012. (Filing No. 1.) On January 9, 2013, the Clerk of the court sent
summons forms and a USM-285 forms to Plaintiff. (Filing No. 4.) Plaintiff has not
returned the forms, and has not completed service of process on Defendant. (See
Docket Sheet.) Indeed, Plaintiff has taken no action in this matter since he filed his
Complaint on November 27, 2012. (See Docket Sheet.)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff shall have until May 27, 2013, to show cause why this case
should not be dismissed. If Plaintiff does not respond, or if good cause is not shown,
this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice.
2.
The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline with the following text: May 27, 2013: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause
why service of process was not completed.

DATED this 14th day of May, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2