Heyne v. Mitsubishi Motors North America et al

Filing 13

ORDER regarding Memorandum and Order 11 . To date, plaintiff has not filed any return of service indicating service on the defendants, and the defendants have not entered a voluntary appearance. The plaintiff is given until February 7, 2014< /b>, to serve his summons and complaint on the defendants, in the absence of which this case may be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA TODD M. HEYNE, Plaintiff, 8:12CV421 vs. ORDER MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA, Inc.; MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION, (Parent Company); UNKNOWN INSURANCE COMPANY OF MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH AMERICA INC., UNKNOWN INSURANCE COMPANY OF MITSUBISHI MOTOR CORPORATION, Defendants. Pursuant to the Order dated August 19, 2013 (Filing No. 11), the plaintiff was instructed to serve his complaint on the defendants within 120 days of that Order. To date, plaintiff has not filed any return of service indicating service on the defendants, and the defendants have not entered a voluntary appearance. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The plaintiff is given until February 7, 2014, to serve his summons and complaint on the defendants, in the absence of which this case may be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution. 2) The clerk shall set a case management deadline of February 17, 2014 to verify compliance with this order. Dated this 8th day of January, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?