Heyne v. Mitsubishi Motors North America et al
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Clerk of the Court shall complete form USM-94 to request service by delivery to the addressee, if the addressee accepts it voluntarily. The Clerk of the Court shall provide two copies of the completed USM-94, and two c opies of the plaintiff's complaint (filings 9 and 9 -1) to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal shall sign the duplicate USM-94 forms and mail the documents to the Japanese central authority by international air mail. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (1 Certified copy to USM)(GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
TODD M. HEYNE,
Plaintiff,
8:12-CV-421
vs.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MITSUBISHI MOTORS NORTH
AMERICA, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on its own motion at the request of the
Clerk of the Court, seeking clarification on international service of process.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1), service may be accomplished by an
internationally agreed means of service, such as the Hague Convention on
the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or
Commercial Matters, opened for signature Nov. 15, 1965, 20 U.S.T. 361
("Hague Convention"). That convention was ratified by the United States in
1969 and Japan in 1970.
The Hague Convention provides for service of a document by the
central authority of the receiving country by a method prescribed by internal
law or by a compatible particular method requested by the applicant. Hague
Convention, art. 5, para. 1. Alternatively, "the document may always be
served by delivery to an addressee who accepts it voluntarily." Id., art. 5,
para. 2. But if the document is to be served under paragraph 1, the central
authority of the receiving country may require the document to be written in
or translated into the official language of the state addressed. Id., art. 5, para
3. Full translation is required by the Japanese central authority. See Hague
Conference on Private International Law, Japan – Central Authority and
Practical Information, http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=authorities.
details&aid=261 (last visited July 24, 2014).
The plaintiff has obviously not provided the Court with a Japanese
copy of the complaint. And there is no statutory provision or federal rule
authorizing the United States government to pay for the costs of translation
in a civil action between private parties. Gomez v. Myers, 627 F. Supp. 183,
186-87 (E.D. Tex. 1985); see Fisch v. Republic of Poland, 2007 Wl 3120274, at
*2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2007); cf. Skudnov v. Russell, 2009 WL 32846, at *1
(W.D. Ky. Jan. 5, 2009).
The Marshals Service form USM-94 (which is the U.S. version of the
Hague Convention's model forms) requires the applicant to elect whether
service is requested pursuant to paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of article 5 of
the Hague Convention. See, generally, United States Department of Justice
Instructions for Serving Foreign Judicial Documents in the U.S. and
Processing Requests for Serving American Judicial Documents Abroad, 16
I.L.M. 1331, 1336 (1977). But if service was requested pursuant to paragraph
1, the document would be returned with a request to provide the required
translation, and service would not be effected. Therefore, the Court will direct
the Clerk of the Court to request service pursuant to paragraph 2 of article 5.
The defendant may then accept service voluntarily, and translation is not
required. See id. But the plaintiff is informed: should the defendant refuse to
accept service voluntarily, it will be the plaintiff's responsibility to provide
the translated documents necessary to compel acceptance of service.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The Clerk of the Court shall complete form USM-94 to
request service by delivery to the addressee, if the
addressee accepts it voluntarily.
2.
The Clerk of the Court shall provide two copies of the
completed USM-94, and two copies of the plaintiff's
complaint (filings 9 and 9-1) to the United States Marshal.
3.
The United States Marshal shall sign the duplicate
USM-94 forms and mail the documents to the Japanese
central authority by international air mail.
Dated this 24th day of July, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?