Hodges v. Green et al
Filing
36
ORDER regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA 34 filed by Valerie Hodges. Plaintiff is granted Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
VALERIE HODGES,
Plaintiff,
8:12CV424
vs.
ORDER
OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendants.
On November 7, 2014, the court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims without prejudice and
entered judgment against Plaintiff. (Filing Nos. 30 and 31.) On November 12, 2014, the court
denied the plaintiff’s motion to reconsider. (Filing No. 33). On November 20, 2014, Plaintiff
filed a Notice of Appeal of the court’s Judgment. (Filing No. 34.) Plaintiff is not a prisoner and
has previously been granted leave to proceed IFP in this matter. (Filing No. 5.)
As set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3):
(a) Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ....
(3) Prior Approval. A party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the
district-court action, or who was determined to be financially unable to obtain an
adequate defense in a criminal case, may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without
further authorization, unless the district court – before or after the notice of appeal is
filed– certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith or finds that the party is not
otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. In that event, the district court must state
in writing its reasons for the certification or finding.
The court finds that because Plaintiff proceeded IFP in the district court, she may now
“proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization.”
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff is granted Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis.
2.
The Clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals with a copy of this
Memorandum and Order.
November 20, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?