Richter v. United States Postal Service
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that plaintiff's 41 Motion for Reconsideration, 43 Motion for Reconsideration, and 42 Motion to Extend are denied. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RUTH RICHTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL
SERVICE,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
8:12CV428
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motions for Reconsideration (filing
nos. 41 and 43) and Motion for Extension of Time (filing no. 42). In her Motions,
Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the court’s June 12, 2013, Order and Judgment, and an
extension of time to have “her Motion for Reconsideration heard.” (Filing Nos. 41, 42
and 43.) The court has carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s Motions and finds no good cause to
reconsider any portion of its June 12, 2013, Order and Judgment.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions for Reconsideration (filing
nos. 41 and 43) and Motion for Extension of Time (filing no. 42) are denied.
DATED this 20th day of June, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for
the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services
or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third
parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any
hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect
the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?