Moyle v. Clarke et al

Filing 76

ORDER that after review of the objections noticed in the trial deposition of Craig Neemann, the objections are overruled or sustained as noted in the order. When objections have been sustained, the question in connection with those objections shall be deleted from the video deposition. When objections are overruled, those objections should also be deleted. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JSF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
WILLIAM J. MOYLE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CONCRETE INDUSTRIES, INC.,
)
ROGER T. CLARKE, and NEBCO,
)
INC.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
v.
)
)
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC., and )
ACUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, its )
workers’ compensation insurer,)
)
Intervenors/Defendants. )
______________________________)

8:12CV434

ORDER

After review of the objections noticed in the trial
deposition of Craig Neemann,
IT IS ORDERED that the objections are overruled or
sustained as noted:
Page 20, Lines 6, 9: Overruled
Page 21, Line 7: Overruled
Page 27, Lines 9, 20-21: Overruled
Page 28, Line 25: Sustained
Page 29, Line 13: Overruled; Line
25: Sustained
Page 30, Line 23: Sustained
Page 31, Line 11: Sustained; Line
20: Overruled

Page 32, Lines 1, 8-9, 14:
Sustained
Page 34, Lines 15-16: Sustained;
Line 25: Overruled
Page 36, Lines 14, 20: Overruled
Page 37, Lines 2-3, 8-9: Sustained
Page 39, Line 24: Sustained
Page 40, Lines 4, 8, 22-23:
Sustained
Page 41, Lines 6-7, 25 and Page 42,
Line 1: Sustained
Page 48, Lines 1-2: Sustained;
Lines 11-12: Overruled
Page 49, Lines 5-6: Sustained
Page 51, Line 5: Overruled
Page 62, Line 24: Overruled
Page 66, Line 4: Overruled
When objections have been sustained, the question in
connection with those objections shall be deleted from the video
deposition.

When objections are overruled, those objections

should also be deleted.
DATED this 24th day of September, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court

-2-