Moyle v. Clarke et al
ORDER denying 63 motion to exclude the defendants' experts. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JDR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
WILLIAM J. MOYLE,
CONCRETE INDUSTRIES, INC.,
ROGER T. CLARKE, and NEBCO,
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC., and )
ACUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, its )
workers’ compensation insurer,)
This matter is before the Court on the motion of
plaintiff to exclude the testimony of defendants’ expert
witnesses (Filing No. 63).
The Court’s Final Progression Order
“Any motion challenging the qualifications of an
expert or the admissibility of testimony of an expert witness
. . . shall be filed not later than August 15, 2013, in the
absence of which any objection based upon said rule shall be
out of time.
Plaintiff’s motion of September 11, 2013, was
Though the parties agreed to extend the deadline
for disclosure of the defendants’ expert witnesses until August
10, 2013, they did not seek an extension of the deadline for
motions objecting to the experts or expert testimony.
the deadline for Daubert motions in the Final Progression Order
is the controlling date, and the Court will hold the parties to
the schedule and consequences set forth in that order.
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to exclude the
defendants’ experts is denied.
DATED this 24th day of September, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?