Frenchman Cambridge Irrigation District et al v. Heineman et al

Filing 50

ORDER granting the parties 49 request to Reconvene the Rule 26(f) conference following the ruling on pending motions to dismiss. Ten business days following the court's ruling on the pending motions to dismiss, Plaintiffs shall reconvene the Rule 26(f) planning conference. Promptly thereafter, the parties shall file their Rule 26(f) planning report. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA FRENCHMAN CAMBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al., 8:12CV445 Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER DAVE HEINEMAN, et al., Defendants. This matter is before the court on the parties initial Rule 26(f) report (Filing No. 48). The parties request their Rule 26(f) conference be reconvened following the court’s ruling on pending motions to dismiss. The request is granted. IT IS ORDERED: Ten business days following the court’s ruling on the pending motions to dismiss, Plaintiffs shall reconvene the Rule 26(f) planning conference. Promptly thereafter, the parties shall file their Rule 26(f) planning report. Dated this 20th day of March, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?