Maher et al v. Creighton St. Joseph Regional Healthcare System, L.L.C. et al

Filing 44

ORDER OF DISMISSAL - IT IS ORDERED: The parties' Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice as to Defendant Creighton St. Joseph Regional Healthcare System, LLC, d/b/a Creighton University Medical Center (Filing No. 43 ) is approved. Plainti ffs' claims against Defendant Creighton St. Joseph Regional Healthcare System, LLC, d/b/a Creighton University Medical Center are dismissed with prejudice. The parties will pay their own attorney's fees and costs, complete record waived. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CINDY MAHER, and RON MAHER, Plaintiffs, 8:13CV9 vs. ORDER OF DISMISSAL CREIGHTON ST. JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.L.C., d/b/a CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice as to Defendant Creighton St. Joseph Regional Healthcare System, LLC, d/b/a Creighton University Medical Center (Filing No. 43). The stipulation complies with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the Court concludes that it should be approved. The parties will pay their own attorney’s fees and costs, with complete record waived. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice as to Defendant Creighton St. Joseph Regional Healthcare System, LLC, d/b/a Creighton University Medical Center (Filing No. 43) is approved; 2. Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant Creighton St. Joseph Regional Healthcare System, LLC, d/b/a Creighton University Medical Center are dismissed with prejudice; and 3. The parties will pay their own attorney’s fees and costs, complete record waived. Dated this 17th day of October, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?