Purdy v. Glenn et al

Filing 35

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff shall have until 9/12/13 to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 12, 2013: deadline for informing court of address. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)

Purdy v. Glenn et al

Doc. 35

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ANTHONY P. PURDY,
Plaintiff,
v.
GLENN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8:13CV14

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On July 31, 2013, the Clerk of
the court sent an Order to Plaintiff at his last known address. (See Text Order at Filing
No. 33.) On August 5, 2013, the Order was returned to the court as undeliverable, and
no forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 34.) Plaintiff has an obligation to
keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3 (e) and (g)
(requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes
within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts
remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall have until September 12,
2013, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this matter will
be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is
directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text:
September 12, 2013: deadline for informing court of address.

Dockets.Justia.com

DATED this 13th day of August, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of
Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts
no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs
the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.