Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff's Complaint (filing no. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
YOUNG YIL JO,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, et al.
Defendants.

8:13CV36

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On January 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed his
Complaint in this matter. (Filing No. 1.) However, Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or file a
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See Docket Sheet.) On March 25, 2013, the court
directed Plaintiff to either tender the $350.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the court or submit a request
to proceed in forma pauperis. (Filing No. 5.) In doing so, the court warned Plaintiff that failure to
comply by April 25, 2013, would result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. (Id.)
Plaintiff did not respond. (See Docket Sheet.)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Complaint (filing no. 1) is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff
failed to comply with this court’s orders.
2.

A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order.

DATED this 7th day of May, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide
on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court
accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work
or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.