Ornelas v. Houston et al

Filing 37

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 8/4/2014: deadline for information court of address) Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
FRANCISCO ORNELAS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT HOUSTON, et al.,
Defendants.

8:13CV118

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On June 24, 2014, the Clerk of
the court sent an Order to Plaintiff at his last known address. (Filing No. 35.) On July
2, 2014, the Order was returned to the court as undeliverable, and no forwarding
information was provided. (Filing No. 36.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court
informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro
se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days).
This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of
this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence
of which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The
Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using
the following text: August 4, 2014: deadline for informing court of address.
DATED this 2nd day of July, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of
Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts
no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs
the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.