Valentic v. Omaha Public Power District et al
Filing
5
ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 4 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RICK J. VALENTIC,
Plaintiff,
8:13CV131
vs.
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT,
(OPPD Management); OMAHA PUBLIC
POWER DISTRICT BOARD MEMBERS,
NEBRASKA EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION, U.S. EQUAL
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, LAW
OFFICE OF SHELDON M. GALLNER,
P.C., LAW OFFICE OF MELANY S
CHESTERMA, ANDERSON, FERGUSON
& ACIERNO, LAW OFFICE OF
MELANY S CHESTERMAN - O'BRIEN
WITH HAUPTMAN, O'BRIEN WOLF
& LATHROP, P.C, NEBRASKA
WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT,
JAMES L QUINLAN, SARA L. MCGILL,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW WITH FRASER
STRYKER, P.C., L.L.O. REPRESENTING
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT,
MELANY O'BRIEN, SHELDON GALLNER,
ORDER
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in
Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 4.) Because the plaintiff has already paid the filing fee in
this matter, his motion is denied as moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in
Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 4) is denied as moot.
Dated this 6th day of May, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?