Valentic v. Omaha Public Power District et al

Filing 5

ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 4 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA RICK J. VALENTIC, Plaintiff, 8:13CV131 vs. OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT, (OPPD Management); OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT BOARD MEMBERS, NEBRASKA EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, U.S. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, LAW OFFICE OF SHELDON M. GALLNER, P.C., LAW OFFICE OF MELANY S CHESTERMA, ANDERSON, FERGUSON & ACIERNO, LAW OFFICE OF MELANY S CHESTERMAN - O'BRIEN WITH HAUPTMAN, O'BRIEN WOLF & LATHROP, P.C, NEBRASKA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT, JAMES L QUINLAN, SARA L. MCGILL, ATTORNEYS AT LAW WITH FRASER STRYKER, P.C., L.L.O. REPRESENTING OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT, MELANY O'BRIEN, SHELDON GALLNER, ORDER Defendants. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 4.) Because the plaintiff has already paid the filing fee in this matter, his motion is denied as moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 4) is denied as moot. Dated this 6th day of May, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?