Richardson v. VIP Research, Inc. et al

Filing 78

ORDER granting the parties' 77 Stipulation. Intervenor Richard D. Myers is a party as that term is used in the Stipulated Protective Order entered on October 7, 2013, (Filing No. 24), and shall have all the rights and obligations of a p arty set forth in that Protective Order, and shall be bound by the Protective Order as if he were a party to this action at the time said Order was entered. Plaintiffs have the right to provide Intervenor Richard D. Myers with access to and/or a copy of all confidential documents and information that Defendants have previously produced or provided, and Intervenor Richard D. Myers shall have all obligations with respect to any such confidential documents as Plaintiffs have under the Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DANIEL L. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, 8:13CV165 vs. ORDER VIP RESEARCH, INC., JOHN DOE, JOURNAL BROADCAST GROUP, Inc.; Defendants. As requested in the parties’ stipulated motion, (filing no. 77), which is hereby granted, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Intervenor Richard D. Myers is a party as that term is used in the Stipulated Protective Order entered on October 7, 2013, (Filing No. 24), and shall have all the rights and obligations of a party set forth in that Protective Order, and shall be bound by the Protective Order as if he were a party to this action at the time said Order was entered. 2) Plaintiffs have the right to provide Intervenor Richard D. Myers with access to and/or a copy of all confidential documents and information that Defendants have previously produced or provided, and Intervenor Richard D. Myers shall have all obligations with respect to any such confidential documents as Plaintiffs have under the Protective Order. September 26, 2014 BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?