Richardson v. VIP Research, Inc. et al
Filing
78
ORDER granting the parties' 77 Stipulation. Intervenor Richard D. Myers is a party as that term is used in the Stipulated Protective Order entered on October 7, 2013, (Filing No. 24), and shall have all the rights and obligations of a p arty set forth in that Protective Order, and shall be bound by the Protective Order as if he were a party to this action at the time said Order was entered. Plaintiffs have the right to provide Intervenor Richard D. Myers with access to and/or a copy of all confidential documents and information that Defendants have previously produced or provided, and Intervenor Richard D. Myers shall have all obligations with respect to any such confidential documents as Plaintiffs have under the Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DANIEL L. RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,
8:13CV165
vs.
ORDER
VIP RESEARCH, INC., JOHN DOE,
JOURNAL BROADCAST GROUP, Inc.;
Defendants.
As requested in the parties’ stipulated motion, (filing no. 77), which is hereby
granted,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
Intervenor Richard D. Myers is a party as that term is used in the Stipulated
Protective Order entered on October 7, 2013, (Filing No. 24), and shall
have all the rights and obligations of a party set forth in that Protective
Order, and shall be bound by the Protective Order as if he were a party to
this action at the time said Order was entered.
2)
Plaintiffs have the right to provide Intervenor Richard D. Myers with access
to and/or a copy of all confidential documents and information that
Defendants have previously produced or provided, and Intervenor Richard
D. Myers shall have all obligations with respect to any such confidential
documents as Plaintiffs have under the Protective Order.
September 26, 2014
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?