Cullan and Cullan LLC v. M-Qube et al
Filing
150
ORDER regarding 149 Uncontested Motion for Matters to be Held in Abeyance. Upon consideration, the motion is granted. The deadline for the plaintiff to file a class certification motion is terminated and the October 29, 2015, class certification hearing is cancelled. Telephone Conference set for 9/14/2015 at 10:00 AM by Telephone before Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken to discuss the status of this case. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the telephone conference with the undersigned magistrate judge and participating counsel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (SLP)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CULLAN AND CULLAN LLC,
Plaintiff and
Counter-Defendant,
8:13CV172
vs.
M-QUBE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
ORDER
Defendant and
Counter-Plaintiff,
and
MOBILE MESSENGER AMERICAS,
INC., a Delaware corporation;
CF ENTERPRISES PTY., LTD., an
Australian company; and
JOHN DOES 1-200,
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s, Cullan and Cullan LLC,
Uncontested Motion for Matters to be Held in Abeyance (Filing No. 149). The plaintiff
represents the parties are attempting to finalize a settlement agreement and an
abeyance of the class certification deadlines will allow the parties time to finalize the
agreement. Upon consideration, the motion is granted. The deadline for the plaintiff to
file a class certification motion is terminated and the October 29, 2015, class
certification hearing is cancelled.
The court will hold a telephone conference on
September 14, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. to discuss the status of this case.
Plaintiff’s
counsel shall initiate the telephone conference with the undersigned magistrate judge
and participating counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 12th day of August, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?